Kuwaiti royal convicted in Swiss forgery case

GENEVA: World sport powerbroker Sheikh Ahmad al-Fahad al-Sabah was convicted on Friday by a Swiss court in a complex forgery case linked to an alleged plot against his political rivals in Kuwait.

After just over a week of hearings, the Geneva Criminal Court convicted Kuwait’s Sheikh Ahmad, handing him a 30-month prison sentence, half of it suspended.

Four other defendants — three Geneva-based lawyers and a Kuwaiti aide — were also found guilty and handed sentences of up to 36 months behind bars.

The five were convicted over an intricate forgery scheme linked to efforts to prove that Kuwait’s former prime minister and speaker of parliament were guilty of coup-plotting and corruption.

The sheikh, who has denied any wrongdoing, sat in the court on Friday, a blue facemask under his bearded chin, shaking his head as the head judge read out his sentence.

The senior member of Kuwait’s ruling family and a former government minister told journalists afterwards that he would appeal.

His office meanwhile issued a statement saying he had decided to “temporarily step aside” from his role at the helm of the Olympic Council of Asia, “until he has successfully appealed the verdict”.

When Swiss prosecutors brought charges against him in 2018, the sheikh also stepped aside from his duties as a longtime member of the International Olympic Committee.

Sheikh Ahmad, who remains the head of the Asian Handball Federation, was accused of orchestrating a fake arbitration case to legitimise suspicious video recordings he presented as evidence of corrupt practices by ex-premier Sheikh Nasser Mohammad al-Ahmad al-Sabah and former parliament chief Jassem al-Khorafi.

In 2013 he provided these recordings to Kuwaiti authorities that he said showed the pair plotting a coup, and conducting corrupt transactions to pocket tens of billions of dollars of public funds.

The authenticity of the video recordings was contested.

According to Friday’s ruling, Sheikh Ahmad’s lawyers then engineered a complex set-up, in which he ceded the broadcast rights of the videos to Delaware firm Trekell.

Trekell — a shell company controlled by the defendants, according to the court — then filed a lawsuit claiming the videos were fake.

This enabled a fictitious arbitration to be set up, the court ruled.