Home / International / The BBC said on Tuesday it had paused its investigation into a presenter accused of paying a young person for explicit images, saying its review was on hold while the police examined the circumstances. Britain’s leading broadcaster has been rocked in recent days by a report in the Sun newspaper that one of its leading presenters had paid a young person 35,000 pounds for explicit photos over three years, beginning when they were 17. The BBC, which dominates Britain’s cultural and news landscape, has suspended the presenter and discussed the situation with the police. The presenter has not been named. Several BBC stars have taken to social media to say they were not involved after speculation swirled online. “The BBC has been asked to pause its investigations into the allegations while the police scope future work,” it said in a statement on Tuesday. The police said on Monday that detectives from its specialist crime command had met with representatives from the corporation and were assessing the information. “There is no investigation at this time,” they added. The BBC is funded by a licence fee paid by every British TV-watching household. It is now trying to investigate the claim about the presenter and protect their privacy, while also being transparent and not putting all of their leading presenters under suspicion. It said on Tuesday it had received the complaint about the presenter in May, but its investigations team had subsequently struggled to get in touch with the complainant. The complaint came from a member of the young person’s family. On Monday, the BBC reported that it had received a letter from a lawyer acting for the young person in the case, to say the allegations were “rubbish”. “The events of recent days have shown how complex and challenging these kinds of cases can be and how vital it is that they are handled with the utmost diligence and care,” the BBC said on Tuesday in its statement.

The BBC said on Tuesday it had paused its investigation into a presenter accused of paying a young person for explicit images, saying its review was on hold while the police examined the circumstances. Britain’s leading broadcaster has been rocked in recent days by a report in the Sun newspaper that one of its leading presenters had paid a young person 35,000 pounds for explicit photos over three years, beginning when they were 17. The BBC, which dominates Britain’s cultural and news landscape, has suspended the presenter and discussed the situation with the police. The presenter has not been named. Several BBC stars have taken to social media to say they were not involved after speculation swirled online. “The BBC has been asked to pause its investigations into the allegations while the police scope future work,” it said in a statement on Tuesday. The police said on Monday that detectives from its specialist crime command had met with representatives from the corporation and were assessing the information. “There is no investigation at this time,” they added. The BBC is funded by a licence fee paid by every British TV-watching household. It is now trying to investigate the claim about the presenter and protect their privacy, while also being transparent and not putting all of their leading presenters under suspicion. It said on Tuesday it had received the complaint about the presenter in May, but its investigations team had subsequently struggled to get in touch with the complainant. The complaint came from a member of the young person’s family. On Monday, the BBC reported that it had received a letter from a lawyer acting for the young person in the case, to say the allegations were “rubbish”. “The events of recent days have shown how complex and challenging these kinds of cases can be and how vital it is that they are handled with the utmost diligence and care,” the BBC said on Tuesday in its statement.

Twitter owner Elon Musk’s freewheeling approach to the platform’s handling of censorship has won support from an unlikely quarter — Afghanistan’s Taliban.

Anas Haqqani, a senior Taliban leader without an official portfolio, said late on Monday that Twitter had “two important advantages” over other social media platforms following the launch of Meta-owned rival Threads.

“The first privilege is the freedom of speech. The second privilege is the public nature and credibility of Twitter,” he tweeted.

“Twitter doesn’t have an intolerant policy like Meta. Other platforms cannot replace it.”

 

The remarks drew an angry reaction from some users, who noted the Taliban government did not allow its own citizens the same rights.

The Taliban had a low-key presence on social media until they stormed back to power in August 2021. Before that, many of their accounts — and those of sympathisers — were frequently blocked as fast as they were created.

Now the government uses Twitter as a major vehicle for announcements, and most ministries and provincial departments have official accounts, although none appear to have paid for a blue tick since Twitter scrapped its verification system earlier this year.

Meta — owner of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and now Threads — is still actively shutting down accounts associated with the Taliban.

Social media observers say accounts with the name “Taliban”, “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan” or featuring the movement’s distinctive flag rarely last long.

Last year, Facebook shuttered the pages of state-owned Radio Television Afghanistan and Bakhtar News Agency, saying at the time it was complying with laws in the United States listing the Taliban as a “terrorist organisation”.

Under Musk, who bought Twitter last year, bans on tens of thousands of accounts — including former US president Donald Trump — were swiftly reversed.

Many had been suspended for reasons such as denying US election results, spreading misinformation about Covid, peddling conspiracy theories or promoting extremist ideologies.

‘Sweet veneer’

Haqqani — son of famed anti-Russian mujahideen fighter turned Taliban Jalaluddin Haqqani, and brother of interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani — is one of the movement’s youngest political leaders.

With more than half a million followers on Twitter, he frequently opines — often in English — on subjects ranging from cricket and poetry to local and global politics.

Several people were swift to criticise his free speech comments Tuesday, pointing to what they characterised as the “hypocrisy” of the remarks.

 

 

The social media activity of ordinary Afghans is closely monitored by the Taliban authorities, and several people have been detained and questioned for posts critical of the Taliban government.

“How shameful it is for you to talk about freedom of expression,” wrote Homeira Qaderi, an exiled author and activist.

 

 

Another exile, journalist and activist Natiq Malikzada, tweeted: “Lol, lauding freedom of speech as a sweet veneer to mask your dark regime, while thousands inside Afghanistan languish in jail for criticising your oppressive rule.

Check Also

Indonesia volcano erupts, thousands evacuated over tsunami threat

MANADO: Indonesia’s remote Mount Ruang volcano erupted several times on Tuesday, authorities said, issuing the …